AI Review
Clause-level analysis. Document-level speed.
Proculr reads every clause in context — identifying risk, deviation from standard positions, and what needs counsel attention.
Request Pilot
Why clause-level analysis changes everything
Most contract review tools operate at the document level — they tell you whether a contract is "high risk" or "low risk" as a whole. That's not enough for procurement counsel who needs to know precisely which clauses deviate from standard, by how much, and what the recommended response is.
Proculr reads each clause in its legal context. A limitation of liability clause is evaluated against your organization's standard cap. An indemnification provision is checked against your playbook's carve-outs. Governing law is verified against your accepted jurisdictions. Each clause gets its own risk assessment, independent of the rest.
- Clause-level risk scoring — not document-level aggregation
- Deviation measurement against your defined standard positions
- Fallback position recommendations at the clause level
- Audit trail for every clause-level decision
Risk Scoring
Three levels of review priority
Every clause receives one of three dispositions — letting procurement counsel focus their time precisely.
Standard — Auto-approve
Clause aligns with your playbook within acceptable parameters. Automatically acknowledged with audit trail. Counsel is not notified.
Elevated — Review Required
Clause deviates from standard position. Routed to counsel with context: what's different, why it matters, and the recommended fallback.
Non-standard — Escalate
Clause falls outside acceptable playbook range or introduces novel risk exposure. Escalated for senior counsel with full analysis.
Example Output
What Proculr shows procurement counsel
A clause flagged for review, with risk annotation, deviation detail, and routing decision.
"In no event shall either party's aggregate liability to the other party arising out of or related to this Agreement exceed one (1) times the fees paid or payable by Customer to Vendor in the twelve (12) months preceding the claim, regardless of the form of action or the theory of recovery."
Proculr Analysis
Deviation identified: Counterparty proposes 1× annual fees cap. Your standard playbook position requires a minimum of 2× annual fees for technology services agreements. Current cap would be inadequate for extended engagements or multi-year contracts.
Recommended Fallback
Negotiate to minimum 2× annual fees, or accept 1× with mutual cap structure applying to both parties equally. If vendor insists on 1×, escalate to VP Legal Operations for deal-level review.
See clause-level analysis on your contracts.
We pilot with enterprise procurement teams. Tell us about your contract volume and review workflow.